1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***CONTINUE FROM 9099***
Based on interviews and the review of documents and information provided, the deep cleaning was performed by two housekeeping staff members. During the cleaning, the housekeeping staff observed that the glass top of R1’s stove was cracked and immediately reported the condition to R1. The staff member identified the cracked glass as a safety hazard and advised that the stovetop should be replaced to prevent potential injury. R1 stated that they were not aware of the damage and agreed to replace the stovetop. A work order was subsequently submitted, and the stovetop was replaced. R1 denies responsibility and states they did not crack the stovetop and claims that the cleaning staff cracked the stovetop when the deep cleaning was done and R1 was then charged by the facility for the repair; while housekeeping staff reported the nature of the damage would have required significant force.
The Department reviewed the Residence and Care Agreement (RCA) which states “Stoneridge Creek will provide all necessary repairs to your Residence. However, you will be responsible for the cost of any extra maintenance or repairs not caused by normal wear and tear as well as any maintenance or repairs of your personal property requested and authorized by you”. Additionally, the Department reviewed ADP Glass invoice. R1’s invoice from Stoneridge, and the work order associated with the repair and found that the workorder was completed and the broken glass was fixed.
Due to this information, the Department finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED – a finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No deficiencies cited.
Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
|