1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***CONTINUE FROM 9099***
The LPA interviewed staff (S1, S2, S3), additional staff (S4) on a follow-up visit, as well as W1. Staff consistently stated that residents who are at risk for falls are monitored closely and checked on regularly. One staff member shared that “residents who need more supervision are checked frequently throughout the shift.” The LPA reviewed resident records, including care plans and physician reports, which showed that R1’s needs, including fall risk and mobility limitations, were assessed and documented.
The LPA reviewed hospice files and R1's charting notes, which revealed that hospice communicates resident needs to staff and check-in observations were documented daily. During the tour, the LPA observed a check-in log in R1’s room showing that staff were checking on the resident at regular intervals and documenting those check ins with initials.
ALLEGATION: Licensee does not ensure that staff are adequately trained - Unsubstantiated
During the course of the investigation, the LPA reviewed staff training records and conducted interviews with staff. The LPA reviewed staff files, including S2 and S3, and an additional file (S4) during a follow-up visit. All training records were up to date and showed that staff completed required initial and ongoing training, including annual training hours. The training included topics related to resident care, such as dementia care and supervision. Staff interviewed were able to explain their responsibilities and how they provide care and supervision. One staff member stated that “we receive regular training, especially for residents with higher care needs.” Additionally, a review of R1’s hospice records revealed that a hospice agency was overseeing R1’s medical needs, including oxygen use, and coordinating care with facility staff. The LPA reviewed hospice communication logs between hospice and care staff.
This agency has investigated the allegations above We have found that the allegations were unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.
|