1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fall due to staff neglect after pressing their call button and attempting to self-transfer when staff did not arrive to provide assistance. LPA interviewed R1, R1’s responsible party, and staff. Interviews revealed that R1 attempted to self-transfer without first pressing their call button for staff assistance. R1 stated that they did not use the call button because response times are often lengthy. However, R1 also reported that staff check on them multiple times throughout the day and evening and that call button response times are generally no longer than 15 minutes. Interviews with staff, R1, and R1’s responsible party confirmed that R1 is a fall risk and is frequently monitored by staff. LPA reviewed R1’s care plan, signed and dated 10/21/2025, which states that R1 “requires supervision and cueing for transfers for safety” and “requires status checks every two hours due to recent hospitalization, illness, history of falls, medication change, etc.” The care plan further directs staff to perform a “SAFETY CHECK: Every 2 hrs. Please do not ring the bell. DO NOT CHECK ON [R1] AFTER 11PM.” Regarding fall prevention, the service plan documents the goal that R1 “will be encouraged to call for assistance when needed.” Interventions include maintaining a clutter-free environment, ensuring support and assistive devices are available and in good repair, keeping the bed in a low position at night when possible, placing personal items and the call device within reach, and providing non-glare soft lighting at night, among other measures. LPA also reviewed call button response records for R1 and observed that calls were typically answered in under four (4) minutes. Records from 11/01/2025 through 12/02/2025 show an average response time of five (5) minutes for 203 pendant alarms and bathroom e-calls. R1 fell during the overnight hours on 11/25/2025 and pressed their call button for assistance at 02:47AM after the fall. Staff arrived in R1’s room to provide assistance five (5) minutes later at 02:52AM. R1’s service plan directs staff to discontinue safety checks after 11:00PM at R1’s request. Therefore, based on interview and record review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegations “Resident sustained an injury due to staff neglect” and “Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner” are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Report Continued on LIC9099-C. |