1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with four out of the remaining five residents stated their privacy is respected during visits and staff do not interfere with those visits. The remaining resident could not be interviewed. Interviews with three out of four staff stated when residents receive visitors, the door to the resident room is closed to provide privacy to the resident and their visitor. Two of those three staff stated if they need to enter the room during the visit, they will knock first to gain permission to enter. The remaining staff stated during the incident when R1 had a visitor on April 26, 2026, S1 knocked on the door before entering R1's room. Record review revealed R1 is cognitive based on their medical assessment.
Based on interviews and record review, the allegation of staff did not allow resident to meet privately with a visitor is therefore deemed unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was left with the facility representative. |