1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with staff revealed that four of four staff interviewed stated they have not witnessed facility staff sharing residents’ personal or confidential information without authorization. Staff stated that they contact physicians or responsible parties when additional medical information is needed for resident care, including updated medication lists, clarification of physician’s orders, discharge paperwork, and changes in condition. Staff further stated they have not released confidential information regarding residents or resident records to unauthorized persons.
During an interview with R1, R1 stated that staff contacted R1’s physician without R1’s consent or knowledge. Interviews with residents revealed that four of four residents interviewed stated they have not experienced facility staff sharing confidential resident information without their consent.
Records reviewed revealed that R1’s Admission Agreement was signed and reviewed with the responsible party. The responsible party initialed the section acknowledging receipt of Resident Rights, which includes the resident’s or responsible party’s right to make decisions regarding medical treatment and advance health care directives. Record review further revealed that the responsible party signed the Consent for Emergency Medical Treatment form, which authorized Fullerton Rosewood Assisted Living to obtain emergency medical or dental care prescribed by a licensed physician for R1. The consent stated that such care may be provided under whatever conditions are necessary to preserve the well-being of the individual named. LPA also interviewed the responsible party, who confirmed being R1’s responsible party, confirmed signing the forms, and stated they had no concerns regarding the facility.
During the investigation, LPA observed that resident records were maintained in a secure location and were not accessible to the public.
Based on interviews and record review, the Department has investigated the allegation that “Resident’s personal rights were violated.” Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Office Assistant Jin Pak, and a copy of this report was provided. |