1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | AW1 reported that W1 attempted to contact the facility representative by telephone and left a business card at the door. AW1 acknowledged that W1 was unable to make contact with the licensee. Interview, with Licensee stated the facility has not had any clients and that the lock was used as an additional measure to protect the property. The Licensee reported being aware that the facility cannot have any secured gates and stated they will be in full compliance once clients are admitted. A review of facility records corroborated the Licensee’s statements, confirming that licensure was completed on August 21, 2025. On April 21, 2026, LPA Barra toured the facility and confirmed a census of zero; LPA Barra also noted that facility rooms did not contain client property.
For the allegation that staff did not respond to an Ombudsman visitation, it was reported that W1 conducted an unannounced visit and did not receive a response at the door from a facility representative. AW1 stated W1 attempted to contact the Licensee and left a business card requesting a callback. AW1 reported they were unable to communicate with the Licensee. Interview with Licensee stated that the facility completed licensure in August 2025 and has not admitted any clients due to delays in obtaining proper insurance. The Licensee reported that they attempted to call the number listed on the business card left by W1, but the operator did not recognize the name on the card and was unable to provide a voicemail message. The Licensee stated they anticipate admitting clients within the next 30–60 days and will have appropriate staffing available during the day as required. A review of facility records corroborated the Licensee’s statements, confirming that licensure was completed on August 21, 2025. On April 21, 2026, LPA Barra toured the facility and confirmed a census of zero; LPA Barra also noted that facility rooms did not contain client property.
Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the allegation that facility staff is utilizing an inappropriate lock on facility gate and staff did not respond to Ombudsman visitation has been deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated, means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to facility representative.
|