1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #2: Staff are not allowing residents to have visitors. Staff interviews and record review reveal that Resident #2 (R2) has visitation restrictions imposed by their conservator.
LPA interviewed five (5) staff members, all of whom stated that residents are not restricted from receiving visitors unless such restrictions are specified through a court order.
LPA also interviewed five (5) residents, all of whom stated they have not been restricted from receiving visitors and have no knowledge of other residents being denied visitation.
Based on observation, record review, and interviews; there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged allegations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation above are Unsubstantiated.
An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Melanie Niez and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit.
|