1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, Staff are not meeting resident's incontinence care needs. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that they change their residents every two hours, and as needed. During resident interview, 3 out of the 6 residents stated that staff meet their incontinence needs. In addition, 3 out of the 6 remaining residents were unable to collaborate on the allegation.
For the allegation, Staff did not notify resident's representative of incident. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that residents’ representatives are notified when an incident occurs. During resident interviews, 6 out of the 6 residents were unable to collaborate on the allegation.
For the allegation, Untrained staff providing care to residents. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that training is provided. In addition, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that training is completed before assisting residents. During record review, LPA Rico observed staff have completed their training.
For the allegation, Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a physical altercation. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that no altercation has occurred between residents. In addition, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they would redirect residents if an altercation were to occur. During resident interviews, 3 out of the 6 residents stated no altercation had occurred. In addition, 3 out of the 6 remaining residents were unable to collaborate on the allegation.
For the allegation, Staff did not ensure resident's medication was properly stored. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated that medication is stored properly. During medication audit, LPA Rico observed all medications to be locked and stored properly.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the six (6) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Business Office Manager Jonathan Guzman.
|