1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation #2, LPA observed the facility menu and toured the facility kitchen, LPA observed the facility to have different variety options for residents.
LPA interviewed 5 residents, 2 of the 5 residents were unable to answer LPA’s question. 3 of the 5 residents informed LPA they are provided with variety options.
LPA interviewed two (2) staff, both staff informed LPA the residents are provided with a variety of food options. Administrator explains to LPA the residents are accommodated and the menu is changed upon request.
Regarding allegation #3, LPA interviewed 5 residents. 2 residents were unable to answer LPA’s question. 3 of the 5 residents informed LPA their belongings are kept safe in their rooms.
LPA interviewed caregiver on duty and informed LPA no residents’ belongings have been stolen at the facility. Administrator explains to LPA it is alleged resident #6 (R6) had stolen an item from resident #7 (R7)'s room, however it was retrieved, given back to the resident, and R7 was given a key to lock their room to ensure no other items would be stolen.
Based on LPA’s observations, staff and resident interviews, and relevant documentation, the allegations are determined to be Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegations may be valid or could have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to support that the alleged violations did or did not happen.
An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Rose Viernes, and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit.
|