1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | [Cont. from LIC 9099]
Staff acknowledged that one wandering resident (R2) recently moved into the community and occasionally enters other residents’ rooms, however, staff stated that these incidents are brief and that redirection occurs immediately when observed or when the incident is brought to their attention by other residents. Interviews further reported that caregivers, med techs, and supervisory staff are present in the hallways throughout the day, conduct frequent checks, and work together to monitor residents who wander.
Regarding the allegation that staff made an inappropriate comment to a resident in care, interviews consistently denied witnessing any staff member speak to a resident in an inappropriate or dismissive manner. Interviews reported that when other residents express frustration about wandering behaviors or other residents entering their rooms, staff respond by redirecting the wandering resident and addressing concerns respectfully, and staff denied ever responding to such complaints in a rude, dismissive, or unprofessional way.
LPA attempted to interview the resident in question (R1), who was reportedly involved in a room-entry incident, but R1 was not available during the visit due to being out in the community and multiple attempts to interview by telephone were unsuccessful. Additional resident interviews reported that they have witnessed R2 wander into their rooms, however staff redirect R2 immediately, and it does not happen often.
Records review of the behavioral service plan for R2, initiated on 05/11/2026, documented that R2 requires redirection, engagement in calming activities, and verbal support when wandering or searching for individuals not present. The service plan noted that the resident responds to reorientation and redirection. The physician’s report further showed that the resident does not utilize a walker or wheelchair and requires special observation due to wandering.
Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided. Their signature confirms receipts of these documents.
|